2021 Ford Puma vs 2021 Peugeot 3008
The Ford Puma and Peugeot 3008 represent two distinct approaches to the compact SUV segment, making them frequent subjects of comparison among European buyers. The Puma, positioned as a smaller, more affordable option, delivers nimble handling and fuel efficiency with its 1.0-litre EcoBoost hybrid powertrain, while the 3008 offers a larger, more spacious package with more powerful engine options ranging up to 2.0-litre turbodiesels and plug-in hybrid variants. Both vehicles have established strong reputations in the European market, but they cater to different priorities—the Puma appeals to budget-conscious buyers seeking economy and agility, while the 3008 attracts those prioritizing space, comfort, and performance.
Detaljno poređenje
| Kategorija | Ford Puma | Peugeot 3008 | Pobjednik |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | Ford Puma 1.0L EcoBoost Hybrid 125kW delivers modest but adequate performance with 0-100km/h acceleration around 10.2 seconds and a top speed of 210 km/h. The mild-hybrid system provides smoother low-speed acceleration and improved efficiency. Real-world acceleration is perfectly adequate for urban driving and highway merging, though highway overtaking requires patience. | Peugeot 3008 offers significantly more power depending on configuration, with turbocharged petrol and diesel engines producing 100-130kW in base models up to 165kW+ in higher trims. The 3008 achieves 0-100km/h in approximately 5.9-8 seconds depending on engine choice, with superior highway performance and more responsive acceleration across all driving conditions. | B |
| Comfort | Ford Puma offers a well-designed cabin with modern ergonomics and good seat comfort for its class. The smaller dimensions (4186mm length, 1550mm height) create a more intimate, car-like driving experience. Passenger space is adequate for four adults but tight for five on longer journeys. Noise insulation is reasonable for the segment, though wind and engine noise become noticeable at highway speeds. | Peugeot 3008 provides noticeably superior cabin comfort with larger dimensions (4542mm length, 1665mm height) translating to more legroom and headroom for all passengers. The interior design is upscale with higher-quality materials in higher trims. Superior sound insulation and a more spacious driving environment make it more comfortable for long-distance travel. Seat comfort benefits from more adjustment options and better lumbar support in higher specifications. | B |
| Technology | Ford Puma features a touchscreen infotainment system with smartphone integration (Apple CarPlay and Android Auto) on most trims. Higher specifications include a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster and climate control (though some ST-Line variants step down to manual air-con). Safety technology includes adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, and blind-spot detection available as optional packages. Updates reflect Ford's mid-generation refresh with modern connectivity but not cutting-edge tech. | Peugeot 3008 boasts more advanced infotainment systems with larger touchscreens (10-inch or larger depending on trim), a fully digital instrument cluster, and more sophisticated driver assistance systems as standard or available options. Technology features are typically fresher and more intuitive, with better integration of navigation and smartphone systems. Higher trims include advanced driver aids and enhanced connectivity features. | B |
| Safety | Ford Puma achieved a full five-star Euro NCAP rating (tested under 2019 standards) with strong performance in crashworthiness. Standard safety features include multiple airbags, stability control, and brake assistance. However, the 2019 test regime is less stringent than 2020+ standards, meaning it does not meet the more demanding frontal offset, side impact, and far-side impact criteria introduced for newer vehicles. This represents adequate but not leading-edge safety provision. | Peugeot 3008 remains untested by Euro NCAP as of 2024, which is a notable gap in safety certification. The vehicle features six airbags (notably missing a front centre airbag, increasingly standard in rivals), electronic stability control, and active safety features. The lack of Euro NCAP certification is a significant concern for safety-conscious buyers, though Peugeot's engineering reputation suggests competence. | A |
| Practicality | Ford Puma delivers impressive practicality for its compact dimensions with 410 litres of boot space with rear seats erect, expanding to 1170 litres with seats folded flat. The cargo area is well-designed and easily accessible. The smaller overall footprint (4186mm length) makes it easier to park and maneuver in tight urban spaces. Five-seat configuration is standard but feels snug for five adults. Fuel tank capacity of 55 litres provides approximately 1122km theoretical range. | Peugeot 3008 offers superior practicality with larger dimensions providing more overall interior space and 395 litres of boot capacity, which exceeds the Puma in absolute terms despite the Puma's fold-flat advantage. The larger vehicle accommodates five passengers more comfortably, particularly on longer journeys. However, the bigger footprint (4542mm length) makes urban parking more challenging. Superior towing capacity (1200kg braked vs Puma's unspecified but likely lower) serves family and commercial needs better. | B |
| Running Costs | Ford Puma 1.0L EcoBoost Hybrid achieves excellent fuel efficiency with official combined consumption of 4.9L/100km and real-world figures around 6.1L/100km reported by owners. CO2 emissions of 121g/km reflect the efficient mild-hybrid system. With a 55-litre tank, this translates to lower fuel bills compared to larger SUVs. Insurance costs are typically moderate for the compact SUV class. Service intervals of 12-15 months and reasonable parts availability keep maintenance affordable. | Peugeot 3008 with 1.2-1.5L diesel or petrol engines shows higher fuel consumption than the Puma, typically in the 5.5-6.5L/100km range depending on engine and driving conditions. CO2 emissions around 111-145g/km represent the trade-off of increased size and power. The larger engine displacement and more powerful configurations result in higher fuel costs. Peugeot parts and service availability varies by market, with potential for higher maintenance costs in some regions. Diesel variants offer better long-distance economy but higher initial costs. | A |
| Resale Value | Ford Puma holds its value well in the European market, supported by strong brand recognition, affordable acquisition costs, and the efficient hybrid powertrain's appeal to second-hand buyers seeking economy. Three to four-year-old examples maintain approximately 55-65% of original value. Strong demand for compact SUVs in the used market supports resale prices. The 5-year warranty coverage from purchase enhances second-hand appeal. | Peugeot 3008 demonstrates solid resale value retention, typically holding 50-60% of original value after three to four years. The larger size, premium positioning, and feature-rich specification support used market demand. However, some market regions show slightly lower retention than comparable German or Japanese competitors. The 2-year warranty from purchase (versus Ford's 5-year) may marginally impact used vehicle valuations. Diesel variants show stronger depreciation than petrol equivalents in current European markets. | Neriješeno |
Prednosti
2021 Ford Puma
Exceptional fuel efficiency with real-world consumption around 6.1L/100km and official figures of 4.9L/100km
Five-star Euro NCAP safety certification (2019 standards) with verified crash protection
Compact dimensions and nimble handling make it ideal for urban driving and tight parking spaces
Spacious boot with excellent fold-flat versatility (1170 litres with seats folded)
2021 Peugeot 3008
Significantly more powerful engines with 0-100km/h acceleration around 5.9-8 seconds depending on configuration
Superior interior space with noticeably more legroom, headroom, and passenger comfort for five adults
Premium interior design with higher-quality materials and more sophisticated infotainment systems
Better long-distance comfort with superior sound insulation and spacious cabin environment
Nedostaci
2021 Ford Puma
Modest performance with 10.2-second 0-100km/h acceleration makes highway merging and overtaking deliberate
Tighter interior space becomes apparent on long journeys or with five passengers
Less sophisticated technology compared to 3008, particularly in infotainment and driver aids
Lower power output (125kW) limits performance enjoyment for driver-focused buyers
2021 Peugeot 3008
No Euro NCAP crash test certification, leaving safety performance unverified by independent testing
Missing front centre airbag, which is becoming standard in newer competitors
Higher fuel consumption (5.5-6.5L/100km) increases running costs compared to Puma's efficiency
Larger footprint (4542mm length) makes urban parking and city driving more challenging
Poređenje cijena
Ford Puma
€20,000 - €28,000
Peugeot 3008
€28,000 - €38,000
The Ford Puma offers superior value for money, delivering a well-equipped, efficient, and certified-safe compact SUV at a significantly lower price point than the Peugeot 3008. For budget-conscious European buyers prioritizing fuel economy and affordability, the Puma provides exceptional value with only modest performance compromises. The 5-year warranty also extends the total cost of ownership advantage.
The Peugeot 3008 commands a premium of €8,000-10,000 over comparable Puma specifications, justified by its larger size, more powerful engines, and premium interior design. For buyers with larger budgets who prioritize space, comfort, and performance over economy, the 3008 represents good value in the premium compact SUV segment. However, for purely financial value assessment, the Ford Puma delivers more capability per euro spent.
The Peugeot 3008 commands a premium of €8,000-10,000 over comparable Puma specifications, justified by its larger size, more powerful engines, and premium interior design. For buyers with larger budgets who prioritize space, comfort, and performance over economy, the 3008 represents good value in the premium compact SUV segment. However, for purely financial value assessment, the Ford Puma delivers more capability per euro spent.
Pouzdanost
Ford Puma
Iznad prosjekaPeugeot 3008
Iznad prosjeka
Ford Puma demonstrates above-average reliability with the 1.0L EcoBoost engine proving robust across multiple model generations. The mild-hybrid system adds complexity but Bosch-supplied components are well-established. The newer 7-speed wet-clutch dual-clutch transmission (7DCT300) represents a significant reliability improvement over older dry-clutch units. Ford's parts availability across Europe is excellent, supporting long-term ownership. Owner reports indicate generally trouble-free operation with proper maintenance, though some examples have reported minor electrical gremlins common to modern vehicles.
Peugeot 3008 maintains an above-average reliability record with proven diesel and petrol engines that have accumulated significant real-world mileage across European markets. The EAT8 automatic transmission shows strong reliability with proper servicing. However, Peugeot historically trails German and Japanese manufacturers in perceived reliability, with occasional reports of electrical and infotainment software issues. Parts availability is good in most Western European markets but can be challenging in some regions. Preventative maintenance is crucial, and some owners report higher-than-expected maintenance costs, particularly for diesel variants.
Peugeot 3008 maintains an above-average reliability record with proven diesel and petrol engines that have accumulated significant real-world mileage across European markets. The EAT8 automatic transmission shows strong reliability with proper servicing. However, Peugeot historically trails German and Japanese manufacturers in perceived reliability, with occasional reports of electrical and infotainment software issues. Parts availability is good in most Western European markets but can be challenging in some regions. Preventative maintenance is crucial, and some owners report higher-than-expected maintenance costs, particularly for diesel variants.
Najbolje za
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is ideal for budget-conscious European drivers seeking an efficient, practical, and safe compact SUV for primarily urban and commuter driving. It suits first-time SUV buyers, young professionals, and families wanting low running costs without sacrificing practicality. The Puma excels for those who value fuel economy, affordable ownership, and award-winning safety certification over maximum space and performance. It's perfect for tight European city streets while retaining enough versatility for weekend family trips.
Peugeot 3008
The Peugeot 3008 best serves buyers who prioritize space, comfort, and performance over economy. It suits growing families needing genuine five-seat comfort, business professionals seeking a premium interior, and drivers wanting stronger acceleration and highway performance. The 3008 appeals to those who appreciate French design and styling, value more advanced technology, and can accommodate higher fuel and maintenance costs. It's ideal for longer journeys where the spacious cabin and refined driving environment justify the premium over the Puma.
Konačna ocjena
Pobjednik: 2021 Ford Puma
The Ford Puma emerges as the overall winner for most European buyers due to its exceptional value proposition, verified safety certification, superior fuel efficiency, and lower ownership costs. While the Peugeot 3008 offers genuine advantages in space, comfort, and performance, the Puma delivers a more compelling package at a significantly lower price point. The Puma is the smarter choice for budget-conscious buyers and daily commuters, whereas the 3008 justifies its premium only for those specifically needing its larger dimensions and more powerful engines. For comprehensive value, reliability, and safety certification, the Ford Puma represents the stronger recommendation in the 2021 compact SUV comparison.